01000100 01101001 01110011 01100011 01101100 01101111 01110011 01110101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101111 01101101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01101001 01110100 01100001 01110010 01101001 01100001 01101110 00100000 01100111 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 00101110 00100000 01001001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01100100 01100101 01100011 01100101 01101110 01110100 01110010 01100001 01101100 01101001 01111010 01100101 01100100 00101110 00100000 01001010 01110101 01101100 01111001 00100000 00110010 00110000 00110010 00110110

True but there isn’t enough bitcoin for them all to retain their wealth in a collapse… only a few will retain a portion of it.

The worst financial advice comes from idiots who hoard billions of fake government money and think they are “rich”. They will be rugged so hard in our lifetime and it will be glorious.

Firing up a knots bip 110 node because Andy back’s core is malware. ⚡️

The era of the "cheap Bitcoin node" is under direct threat. 📉 SSD prices are skyrocketing (some up 500% in 2026), making the hardware barrier to entry higher than ever. At the same time, chain bloat is accelerating. If we allow VC-funded "fiat profit" projects to bloat the chain for their own gain, we are effectively pricing out the average and poor Bitcoiner. Decentralization isn’t a luxury… it’s a requirement. If only the wealthy can afford the hardware to verify the chain, we’ve lost the security of the network. We must protect the ability for everyone to run a node, not just those with deep pockets. #bip110 Check the status of adoption here: https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110 We are just getting started !

Here’s what Satoshi actually said about the “quantum” threat before people lose their minds over nonsense… https://primal.net/e/

What kind of moron is paying for this? 😂

It’s great to see more good music on Wavlake ⚡️congrats

He’s winning the prize for worst “bitcoin” influencer that’s for sure. At the very least, he’s an idiot getting played by Lutnick.

You obviously did not have abusive parents. Very inconsiderate of what others went through. Many people have parents that are inherently selfish and abusive. Forgiveness solves nothing and often allows for further abuse. It’s better to just let them go.

Let me be more clear on why “it’s” more of a marketing label: Bitcoin exhibits more genuine quantum properties than any supercooled chip being marketed as a “quantum computer” today. 1- Bitcoin’s UTXO set exists in a state of non-local superposition across thousands of independent nodes simultaneously with no canonical location, and that state only collapses through energy-grounded consensus when a block is confirmed. That is structurally identical to how quantum coherence resolves. 2- The ledger is not stored somewhere, it IS the network, and the network is grounded in thermodynamic reality because every block required irreversible energy expenditure to produce. 3- Bitcoin does not require an authority as proof of its function. It relies on direct experience (via node runners) and has never been hacked in over 17 years. Meanwhile, the machines being called quantum computers cannot maintain coherence for more than milliseconds, have never cracked more than 15 bits of encryption despite years of hype, yet claims that it’s a threat to BTC. They exist almost entirely as a narrative of future capability. So yes, quantum computing as an analogy for Bitcoin is contradictory only if you accept the marketing label at face value. Or appeal to their authority. Strip that away and the question becomes which system actually demonstrates non-locality, energy grounding, and consensus-based state resolution at scale. Bitcoin does that right now. The supercooled chips do not.

Bitcoin’s UTXO set exists in non-local superposition across thousands of nodes and collapses only through energy-grounded consensus. Today’s ‘quantum computers’ can’t even maintain coherence for milliseconds. Which one is actually quantum? you actually going to keep pretending these “scientists” know something about a “quantum” threat? WE ARE THE QUANTUM THREAT. #bitcoin

it’s also alluding to the fact that Bitcoin is not only based n physics but it’s an example of quantum coherence or meaning it exists in multiple possible states simultaneously rather than collapsing into one definite state.(something that “quantum” computers are claiming with no evidence) Current quantum computers require extreme isolation, fail constantly, and have produced no cryptographically relevant results… so “quantum” is largely a marketing label. s framework is spot on in my opinion. ⚡️

Watching Bitcoiners fall for the appeal to authority fallacy is hilarious… Especially devs trusting a threat that you can’t see, understand and have zero evidence of. 🤣