I love this site and use it often.

There are many variables and factors that can define what a moat is. Google certainly has a moat in that millions rely on their services and have little to no desire to switch. Can you vibe up a similar product(s) as Google? Sure. Will people flee Google to use your product? Probably not.

I have to work with it to do some of my job but I do so through a third party app. I normally don't even log in. Definitely don't have it on my phone.

Not at random. Most 401Ks are in a fund that carries significant portions of the S&P500. And though there are "rules" for inclusion, the board has the final say of who is in and out. The S&P500's growth, however, is linked more with inflation than 401Ks themselves, which inflation also impacts. If you want to beat inflation, you should be carrying about 10 or fewer companies in the S&P. Which means, 490 lag inflation and the stock values are subsidized by the 10 and, to your point, the constant stream of funds entering market.

Wait a second...

You may release your statement again in roughly 72 hours.

Modern buildings aren't even designed to last 140 years.

WORD5 #530 4/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛ 🟪⬛🟪⬛⬛ 🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://word5.otherstuff.ai

Not really. I believe the $200 sub is being heavily subsidized. Actually cost of compute power is probably between $2000 and $5000 a month. When they run out of cash, that $200 will have to go up. The price will be out of reach for the vast majority of users and everyone will be competing without AI again. Granted, they could find a way to reduce computing costs, but we'll need easy access to chips and a few more nuclear plants built before that happens.

Okay Knotzi.

The West's demonization of nuclear was one of our biggest retard moments.

1. 5 is better than 1 2. I didn't appreciate the change in v30 either and haven't upgraded. Doesn't make Knotzis any better or a suitable alternative. 3. Spam isn't a problem. I know this because I am not new and seen when there was issues.

I'm not sure I agree. Humans routinely overestimate the impact a new technology is going to have on society. I also wouldn't say the Industrial Revolution was a rounding error. We went from 90% agricultural jobs in 1790 to under 2% today. That is a huge shift. But it also took 200 hundred years. That first decade, ag jobs were reduced by 5%. That's not an insignificant move. It reduced around 5% each decade for the next 60 years. I'm fairly certain AI will have a large impact. But I am NOT certain it is going to make the industrial revolution look like a rounding area. Especially since most of these companies are burning through cash, are way overvalued, and will likely suffer a bubble collapse in the near future. If using AI helps you create more value, you should integrate into your workflow. If not, then don't. You don't need to stay on the bleeding edge to get through this transition. If you don't understand AI today, don't worry, it'll become understandable and easier to use. You might miss out on first mover effects but most businesses are just copies of others.

No one said incentives could be, at times, wrong. Voluntary, bottom-up incentives are ALWAYS better than top-down authoritarian incentives. What spam?

Yes, economic incentives. It is how all things should run. More moral than rules too. Also, greed? Have you seen the fees in the mempool. They're cheap. I've refused to upgrade to v30, but also don't be an idiot.

Historically, the opposite has been true. We often overestimate the impact.

WORD5 #529 4/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟪 🟧⬛⬛⬛🟪 ⬛🟪⬛🟪🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://word5.otherstuff.ai

Ha! WORD5 #527 5/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧 ⬛⬛🟪🟪🟪 ⬛⬛🟪🟪🟪 ⬛⬛🟪🟪🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://word5.otherstuff.ai

Or tell her that she is a Keynesian...