this is a top post on SN. 16 years after deployment and a decade of LN development DriveChain is Bitcoins last chance, otherwise it dies https://stacker.news/items/1530172

Even on release tge LN paper outlined a programmaticly inelegant design by unix philosophy standards, of which drivechains is closer to. That much was obvious at the time, but overall it was as you say 100%(98%?) A few iterations later it was more and more obvious that managing channels was never going to be a thing that scales sovereignty m. But we remained hopeful and the money kept rolling in.

yup

Hmmm... that sounds like democracy Bitcoin is not a democracy ideally all users would be miners, then their voice would at least have weight and your line of reasoning would make sense non mining nodes though, by design are just cheerleaders, and not ***in the game***

like flat earthers

is he on nostr?

Sztorc is also developping Simple pool as a final open solution to decentralized mining

why should nodes decide? They have very little cost and have contributed nothing to the network...

source?

yes it is