Murray Rothbard once observed that "the State is that organization in society which attempts to maintain a monopoly of the use of force and violence in a given territorial area." This wasn't just philosophical musing—it was a precise diagnosis of how bureaucracy operates as the enforcement arm of political power, insulated from market accountability. Consider how government agencies respond to failure: they demand larger budgets, more staff, and expanded authority. When the TSA fails security tests, when the FDA delays life-saving treatments, when central banks create inflation—the solution is always more resources, never elimination. Private companies that perform this poorly simply cease to exist. The bureaucrat's incentive structure is the complete inverse of productive enterprise. Success means budget cuts and obsolescence, while failure guarantees growth and importance. Rothbard understood that this wasn't a bug in the system—it was the feature that keeps the whole apparatus alive and expanding. The Austrian insight remains devastatingly relevant: without profit and loss signals, without the possibility of bankruptcy, bureaucracy becomes a self-perpetuating organism that consumes resources while producing theater. The cure isn't reform—it's competition and the right to exit.