neither one of those is necessary. any page can surface nostr content in many ways. any blog could use nostr as a cms. any page can provide a filter view of live events there is no nostr. nostr is anything

said another way: this is how you provide session management for high frequency trading

i once used a similar technology at small scales to build a distributed web service with sub millisecond https response times. it was so fast that now they're stuck with it – any sane http framework is at least an order of magnitude slower https://29west.wordpress.com/tag/latency-busters-messaging-lbm

if there's a huge delta you can bit pack the indexes that you're missing, which is about 400k, but gzip will crush it pretty well

the problem is that you have "some things" and i have "some things". ideally there's some way for me to also have what you have without downloading your entire db. bloom filters are a classic choice. a simple version of that is an array of 32 bit event prefixes. i download a million of those (4 mb) and walk through it taking notes on what i don't have. then i ask for the missing prefixes and you have a million files, each of which contains all the events starting with that prefix. like bittorrent, or reliable udp. you waste some bandwidth to reduce the number of round trips

trust me it's paradise this is where the hungry comes to feed for mine is a generation that circles the globe in search of something we haven't tried before so never refuse an invitation never resist the unfamiliar never fail to be polite and never outstay your welcome just keep your mind open and suck in the experience and if it hurts you know what... it's probably worth it you hope, and you dream but you never believe that something is going happen to you not like it does in the movies and when it actually does you expect it to feel different more visceral more real [...] I still believe in paradise but now at least i know it's not some place you can look for because it's not where you go it's how you feel for a moment in your life and if you find that moment it will last forever [orbital : beached]

i bet sync would fly if things were bucketed by "hour first seen"

there are many options available to her, but in the end anything short of a full wallet requires her to trust you. in the end she probably wasn't bothered as much as you were you can lead people to bitcoin, but you can't make them stop trusting people

#postsToLinkedin ai productivity ai isn't magic, and there's many ways for it to be wrong. it might not have understood the question, might have not had appropriate context, might not have the necessary capabilities, or could have flat out lied / hallucinated. which is no different from people. and when you have people help you accomplish something, your job hasn't gone away: you've become a manager how you structure this trade is the best predictor of your opinion on ai. modeled as a simple cost-benefit ratio, you benefit from the work being done and it cost you the work to verify it. you want to have the ai do more work at a time, and you want it to be easier to verify. if you think about it, this is why everyone hated copilot years ago – it wasn't capable of doing very much, and you spent way too much time debugging the results. this hasn't gone away. many open source projects have changed their contribution policies to forbid anything that even smells like ai, because their established process for accepting changes has become overwhelmed my advice is to tame the "problem of ai" by using "even more ai". this sounds nonsensical, or at least hopelessly naive. as someone who has long railed against complexity, i fully agree. but from a certain angle, the definition of intelligence is the ability to simplify something. which implies that ai is software that is at least somewhat capable of simplifying things. so you should ask it to review its own work before you do. you can also have a new context review it without knowing anything about how the work was done. looking at something with fresh eyes is a classic way to find problems, and it's never been easier than it is today you can also have ai prove its own work. that can be arguing against it, having it write test suites, having it predict behavior in unlikely scenarios, even having it brainstorm what those unlikely scenarios might be. running that backwards, for important things it's good to ask the ai where mistakes might be made in this type of work, to predict how its solution would behave in them, and to write tests around those. maybe even write exhaustive tests, because why not? it's cheap, and even if it doesn't find everything, anything it does find reduces your work later so far everything has been about reducing the cost of using ai. but this is a long post for LinkedIn. i'll leave increasing the value for next time. but here's a teaser: it doesn't involve cursor

the highest leverage a maker can have is to properly define success and gtfo. claude's got you

i pushed deposits down to layer 2. if the math holds, that's all we'll need