
It's from a historical account of the tech discussions on a public domain, dig it up if you don't believe me.
π This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
EditIt's from a historical account of the tech discussions on a public domain, dig it up if you don't believe me.
Trying to filter out sinful "transactions" connected to the sin of gambling is what it is. The guy is a fanatic who is the only one who can merge changes. That's enough of a reason to avoid knots for me. You do you though.
The settings is still configurable, and it is not a given that it will be eliminated given the current fiasco. You didn't address the core premise in my reply: only one person has commit power in Knots and they guy is a known religius fanatic that defends state's right to government people. It is not a trivial thing. It brink all of the Knots guys are being hoodwinked. If you're so keen on choice, just run earlier versions of Core, instead being knots only guy.
Are they really? Why would you run a client that is being controlled by a religious fanatic that thinks the state is in its right to govern people? That openly argued for censoring transactions that were connected to gambling aka sinful acts? I do not feel this is the right way to go for open source freedom tech that is of utmost importance to humanity. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/bitcoin-core-vs-bitcoin-knots-actions-speak-louder-than-words#google_vignette
Is there any inconsistencies in what is being proclaimed here by Shinobi? https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/bitcoin-core-vs-bitcoin-knots-actions-speak-louder-than-words#google_vignette
I'd argue reading and/or any other deep work comes from passion and turns into vocation. People are generally less passionate about skills and more passionate about fading looks. Maybe that's the reason; irrespective of that, screens and social networks are the main reasons.
Bitcoin is code (aka software) β run by anyone, stopped by no one. What you are describing above are just its emergent properties.
Anyone who defends statism and declares state's right to govern over sovereign individuals is not understanding Bitcoin.
You're the idiot if you think otherwise: above all else, bitcoin is a software.
An unsettling realization: most people in #Bitcoin space lack critical thinking skills. I thought this group would be more resistance to emotionally triggered behavioral patterns.
It's a fuckin software.
What's wrong with Americans these days?
People seem to forget the simple truth; intrinsically, bitcoin is an open-source software. Its qualia are immutability and persistence β once released, it canβt be uninvented, canβt be recalled, and canβt be stopped. It runs wherever someone decides to run it, beyond borders, laws, or control.
Tylenol is a brand name. It's paracetamol.
As if normies care about receiving sats. Only education can switch normies' hardwired brains to appreciate self-sovereignty.
I wrote a comparison post a while back, might be of help.
Temporary shitcoin hype cycles are not capable of outbidding legitimate monetary use cases. If you think #Bitcoin can be stopped by some spam, you gotta reassess. Bitcoin is code β nobody can stop it.
Thanks for the reply. What about just running v29 with my own limits? Isn't that practically the same thing?
She role eat up the narratives over and over again. There's no hope.
Great news, thanks for sharing. Any advantages of using this over for example ?
The bigger idiot here is obviously the vetican; knowing how judaism treats jesus, they still move with them in tandem.
Nostr-initiated c. 694777: keys, not credos