Oops much love bro

I hear you, this is where first principles compete and we have to draw on contextual wisdom. So in my opinion, the sole issue here is when taproot accidentally allowed contiguous spam. Thats all I want fixed, which is a very specific and important reversion of behavior that was acccidentally reduced, aka a bug. In this way, Im behaving as a radical fundamentalist, Im behavinf as a pragmatist wanting an unintentional bug fixed. On the other hand, core refused to fix it and then cannonized it with the OP_RETURN increase. Core’s path, although not an explicit fork but the canonizing of a bug in the fork, is what you and I actually should agree on based on how I understand your position. Thanks for putting your energy into this issue ✨

yes, unless of course a previous fork unintentionally broke it in an existential way

Bless your life brother 💪

Bro call me, we can sort this out in an hour. Bip110 is not at all what youre saying it and not repairing ghe contiguous spam is a direct an imminent threat to bitcoin’s philosophy of being used as money and not being a relic like gold

Yup, and we do that by running bip110

Dude i love you, but you got this all wrong, stay humble and think with first principles

May bip110 save us all 🕊️